Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Around for the Long Haul

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.15.07]

This is fairly old, but underreported news. We are building an enduring, military presence in Iraq. Check out more on military news here.
As of mid-2005, the U.S. military had 106 forward operating bases in Iraq, including what the Pentagon calls 14 “enduring” bases – all of which are to be consolidated into four mega-bases.

1) Green Zone (Baghdad) includes the main palaces of Saddam Hussein. The area houses the offices of major U.S. consulting companies and the temporary U.S. embassy facilities.

2) Camp Anaconda (Balad Airbase) Logistical base is spread over 15 square miles and is being constructed to accommodate 20,000 soldiers.

3) Camp Taji (Taji) Former Iraqi Republican Guard “military city,“ is now a huge U.S. base equipped with a Subway, Burger King and Pizza Hut.

4) Camp Falcon-Al-Sarq (Baghdad) In late September 2003, the 439th Engineering Battalion delivered over 100,000 tons of gravel and is assisting with building roads, walls, guard towers, and buildings for Camp Falcon planned to house 5,000 soldiers.

5) Post Freedom (Mosul) Saddam Hussein’s former palace in Mosul is currently home to the 101st Airborne Division.

6) Camp Victory- Al Nasr (Baghdad Airfield) Is a U.S. Army base situated on airport grounds about 5 kilometers from Baghdad International Airport. The base can house up to 14,000 troops.

7) Camp Marez (Mosul Airfield) Located at an airfield southwest of Mosul, has a tent dining capacity for 500.

8) Camp Renegade (Kirkuk) Strategically located near the Kirkuk oil fields and the Kirkuk refinery and petrochemical plant, has a dormitory that houses up to 1,664 airmen.

9) Camp Speicher (Tikrit) Named after F/A-18 pilot Michael “Scott” Speicher who was shot down during the first Gulf War in 1991, is located near Tikrit in northern Iraq.

10) Camp Fallujuh (Rail Station?) The exact whereabouts and name is unknown. Analysts believe that the U.S. is building an “enduring base” in Fallujah, a large town forty miles west of Baghdad. Fallujah has proved to be the most violence prone area in Iraq.

11) Unknown name (Nasiriyah) The exact whereabouts and name is unknown. Analysts believe that the U.S. is building an “enduring base” near Nasiriyah, a provincial capital of South-East Iraq.

12) Unknown name (between Irbil and Kirkuk)

13) & 14) Unknown Locations

Better Living through Technology

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.14.07]
Bagdad via Google Earth

From the BBC:
As the communal bloodshed has worsened, some Iraqis have set up advice websites to help others avoid the death squads.

One tip - on the Iraq League site, one of the best known - is for people to draw up maps of their local area using Google Earth’s detailed imagery of Baghdad so they can work out escape routes and routes to block.

For some time now, vigilante-style guard forces have been operating in many neighbourhoods, especially in Sunni areas targeted by Shia militias.

With Google Earth, the Iraq League website suggests, people can also work out the most likely approach of their attackers.

It’s thought that insurgents have also used the map site, examining the detailed images to pick out potential targets.

More here.

Our Army is Broken

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.13.07]


Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is the most common psychological injury of war. Experts have found evidence of PTSD in troops from every major American war – from WWI, when it was called combat fatigue, and WWII, when it was dubbed shell shock, to as far back as the Civil War, when it was called soldier’s heart. Even in the 17th century, German doctors noticed psychological scarring among combat veterans, and they named the condition heimwah, meaning homesickness; centuries before that it was called nostalgia. In any given war, historians conclude, an average of 10-20% of fighting soldiers are afflicted.

PTSD is brought on by a “death encounter,” an existentially profound brush with mortality in which death is perceived as a real possibility rather than an abstraction. All men do not respond equally to these death encounters. Highly intelligent people seem better equipped to survive a trauma unscathed, while those who score low on IQ tests seem to suffer the most, according to several studies. The trauma “explodes the cohesion of consciousness,” in the words of Jonathan Shay, a PTSD expert at Boston University.

According to a landmark study conducted by Army researchers and published in The New England Journal of Medicine, PTSD rates for soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan are running between 10 and 15 percent.

This equates to around 10,000 cases per year since the Afghan and Iraqi began. Yet, in the first half of 2006, only 716 soldiers were diagnosed and evacuated because of PTSD. Why?

Well, initially it was because after Bush declared the Iraq invasion “Mission Accomplished,” the military recalled the handful of mental health teams in Iraq and Kuwait. And the Department of Defense (DOD) budget submitted before the war started had a zero in the line item for mental health casualties, because they never planned for a long war or an occupation.

But then it got worse. A failed soldier represents a failed war. So for the past 3 years, neo-cons in the DOD and the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) have taken steps to downplay the psychological toll of the war. DOD doctors are being pressured to limit their diagnoses of PTSD.

And worse. After the head of the VA, Anthony Principi, testified in 2004 before Congress that the VA lacked the funds to take care of the influx of veterans, he was replaced by neo-con James Nicholson. Nicholson made attempt after attempt to undercut PTSD diagnoses, attempting to contradict and supersede the American Psychiatric Association’s definition (which is the standard).

“Iraq is Vietnam without the water.” Hang around soldiers long enough and you will hear one of them say this. Actually the statistics suggest Iraq is a lot scarier than Vietnam. An exhaustive study of 303,905 veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan done by a team of military doctors from the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research showed that combat exposure is near universal and 24/7 in Iraq. The likelihood of a soldier having to face live fire is higher than in any previous American war.


  • 93% of Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans report having been shot at;
  • Some 77% have pulled the trigger in an attempt to kill, roughly 3 times the trigger rate of WWII;
  • 95% have seen dead bodies; and
  • 89% reported having been ambushed or attached.

There is no safe zone in an urban war insurgency.

The living conditions are extremely stressful. Think Burning Man without any amenities for months on end.

Soldiers live in cramped, dusty conditions in searing 110-degree heat, enduring ambushes in the morning and lethal mortar attacks at night. Tight restrictions on Americans in Iraq bases on porn and alcohol add to this brew.

The diagnosis and long-term treatment of PTSD is one of the many hidden costs of this war. Long-term treatment of this disorder can cost more than $1 million over the course of one afflicted veteran’s life. Indeed, the VA has recently been inundated with Vietnam vet’s suffering from PTSD who’ve found that the VA pharmacy is less costly than Medicare prices. This is one of the line items in Nobel Prize-winning US economist Stiglitiz’s determination of the true cost of this war ($2.37 trillion and counting).

But the Bush administration never figured those costs in. The orders have been given: the pressure is on to under-diagnose the problem to save face and to save money. So, sick, mentally-ill men are released into the general population and denied treatment even when they seek it.

Jason Burgoyne (pictured above) was one of those men. Burgoyne’s commander in Kuwait overrode Army medic Adam Kroll’s diagnosis of evacuation and treatment in an Army hospital in Germany. Instead he ordered that this “hero…should be with his men,” and shipped him back to the States with his unit. When he got back to Georgia, his mom escorted him to an Army hospital where he had a 5-minute phone conversation with an Army psychiatrist and was then released. 2 days later Burgoyne attacked a fellow soldier, stabbing him 32 times. He’s now doing 20 years in the mental ward of a Georgia prison.

And what of Adam Kroll? He was dishonorably discharged for his clash with that commander. Kroll comes from a military family: his father, brother, mother and ex-wife have all served. So, he had protested the commander’s decision to release Burgoyne back to the States with his unit. As a whistle-blower he was punished for it.

This is the true face of the neo-cons and the Bush administration: cover-up the true costs and the pain of war.

In the new commercials for the Army, they show a young person (usually of color) speaking directly to the camera, as if talking to a parent, explaining all of the benefits they’ll receive by joining the Army. What those kids don’t know is that if you get hurt mentally in the fog of war, you won’t receive the help that may put you back together again. For some, that may be worse than never coming back at all.

John Brown went off to war to fight on a foreign shore.
His mama sure was proud of him!
He stood straight and tall in his uniform and all.
His mama’s face broke out all in a grin.

“Oh son, you look so fine, I’m glad you’re a son of mine,
You make me proud to know you hold a gun.
Do what the captain says, lots of medals you will get,
And we’ll put them on the wall when you come home.”

As that old train pulled out, John’s ma began to shout,
Tellin’ ev’ryone in the neighborhood:
“That’s my son that’s about to go, he’s a soldier now, you know.”
She made well sure her neighbors understood.

She got a letter once in a while and her face broke into a smile
As she showed them to the people from next door.
And she bragged about her son with his uniform and gun,
And these things you called a good old-fashioned war.

Oh! Good old-fashioned war!

Then the letters ceased to come, for a long time they did not come.
They ceased to come for about ten months or more.
Then a letter finally came saying, “Go down and meet the train.
Your son’s a-coming home from the war.”

She smiled and went right down, she looked everywhere around
But she could not see her soldier son in sight.
But as all the people passed, she saw her son at last,
When she did she could hardly believe her eyes.

Oh his face was all shot up and his hand was all blown off
And he wore a metal brace around his waist.
He whispered kind of slow, in a voice she did not know,
While she couldn’t even recognize his face!

Oh! Lord! Not even recognize his face.

“Oh tell me, my darling son, pray tell me what they done.
How is it you come to be this way?”
He tried his best to talk but his mouth could hardly move
And the mother had to turn her face away.

“Don’t you remember, Ma, when I went off to war
You thought it was the best thing I could do?
I was on the battleground, you were home . . . acting proud.
You wasn’t there standing in my shoes.”

“Oh, and I thought when I was there, God, what am I doing here?
I’m a-tryin’ to kill somebody or die tryin’.
But the thing that scared me most was when my enemy came close
And I saw that his face looked just like mine.”

Oh! Lord! Just like mine!

“And I couldn’t help but think, through the thunder rolling and stink,
That I was just a puppet in a play.
And through the roar and smoke, this string is finally broke,
And a cannon ball blew my eyes away.”

As he turned away to walk, his Ma was still in shock
At seein’ the metal brace that helped him stand.
But as he turned to go, he called his mother close
And he dropped his medals down into her hand.

–Bob Dylan, 1963

This piece was written using large parts of Mark Boal’s article, The Real Cost of War, in the March ’07 Playboy.




Troop Support

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.12.07]

WASHINGTON, Feb. 12, 2007 - The Defense Department’s America Supports You program transcends politics in its mission to support the men and women of the U.S. armed forces.

“I think we have a great history of that through our America Supports You program,” Allison Barber, deputy assistant secretary of defense, said. “Over the past two and a half years, we’ve seen hundreds and thousands of people who say, ‘We’ll debate the policy of the (Iraq) war in a certain venue, but we will never, ever debate the important piece of whether or not we support the people who fight our wars.’”

America Supports You is a Defense Department program launched in fall 2004 to highlight and facilitate the ways Americans and the corporate sector are supporting the nation’s servicemembers.

“Over two and a half years ago our troops were hearing things in the media and seeing things that made them question if the folks back home were still supporting them,” she said. “Because of those questions, the Department of Defense launched … the America Supports You program.”

More than 250 groups now are taking part in the program, doing various things for the troops from sending care packages to donating frequent flyer miles to building homes for wounded servicemembers, she said.

This site is a good jumping off point for individuals and companies wanting to help our soldiers. There several hundred links to other organizations that one can join or contribute to that help. Check it out here!

More War Blogs

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.8.07]

Riverbend Blog, which I wrote about previously, is featured in the current issue of Rolling Stone along with several other Iraqi bloggers. It’s worth a look:

Iraqi Confused Kid – “news and articles about the absurdity of living in Iraq by an Iraqi former heavy-metal guitarist in a no-particular-place-to-go heavy-metal band.”

Great list of “Important Iraqi Videos” links.

In the past, I didn’t want to leave Iraq - earlier to February 2006, life was difficult, but in a way, Iraqis got used to it, after my friends were killed, it took on a whole new meaning, and two days after the last friend passed to the world beyond, I heard this story, it was all I needed to know that there is no life for me here anymore.[1/7/07]

A Family in Baghdad – “mother: Faiza, sons: Raed, Khalid , and Majid writing down their diaries. Father: Azzam is not interested.”

Each son has his own sub blog; mom has a blog to teach you Arabic.

Peace be upon you…

What does it mean for a human being to live in a state of waiting? What does it mean when his whole life is restless, unstable, and hanging from a thread?

This is how I feel, and so are the feelings of millions of Iraqis inside Iraq and abroad, since the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, until now…

At the beginning, we used to wait for services to get better, for the emergence of a new government; one that would think in a new way and act with a democratic mentality, an advanced professional mentality that would improve the infrastructure of the country: the water services, the electricity, the communication systems, the schools, hospitals, etc…

Iraq has oil, water, fertile lands, and precious metals. Iraq is the of land of resources since ancient times, and the Iraqis, like all other nations in the world, dream of living a secure, and settled life…[1/25]

Iraq the Model – “New points of view about the future of Iraq.”

This one is pro-Bush, pro-American. Has a link to Pajamas Media.

In Baghdad when it is suddenly quiet around you for any length of time you can expect someone nearby to turn to you and say suspiciously, “Isn’t it quiet outside?”

By “quiet” the speaker means that there have been no sounds of explosions or gunfire for a few hours. Those sounds are now part of normal daily life in Baghdad while “quiet” is a state that invites amazement and suspicion. In this city it’s usual to respond to the above question with “Let’s hope it stays like this.”[1/26]

Healing Iraq – “Daily news and comments on the situation in post Saddam Iraq by an Iraqi dentist.”

Great links to other Iraqi blogs (e.g., The Mesopotamian, Ishtar Talking, Roads to Iraq, Baghdad Girl, etc.).

Another close call today in my neighbourhood in Baghdad. It was showered with over 30 mortar shells from nearby Shi’ite districts after news of the attacks against Shia pilgrims in Diyala got out. One shell tore through a bedroom on the second floor of my grandmother’s house, which is next to ours. No one was hurt, thankfully. Another hit a nearby house and killed our long-time neighbour who was on the roof.

U.S. soldiers, who have cordoned the district for the last few days, knocked on our door at 6 a.m. My family was asleep and they didn’t hear it. The U.S. soldiers then went to my grandmother’s house next door and stayed for four hours, drinking tea and chatting with my uncle. My uncle, a former army officer and a fierce Arab nationalist, seems to have told the American soldiers all about the history of Iraq’s colonisers, all the way back to the Mongols and Hulago. My family said the American soldiers, who listened attentively to my uncle’s story, apologised and told him that they did not want to be in Iraq either but they did not have much of a choice.[1/31]

Early Histories III: Afghanistan

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.7.07]

1979: April — Zbigniew Brzezinski instructs the CIA to develop a comprehensive plan for a secret war in Afghanistan backed by the US. July – Carter signs document authorizing US to arm the mujahideen. December – USSR invades Afghanistan. “It [the US arming of the rebels] had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap” – Z. Brzezinski

1979 — 88: US pours $3 billion into Afghanistan (matched by $3 bil from Saudi-Arabia); Green Berets are sent in to teach the rebels how to use the high-tech weapons the US is supplying.

Saudi intelligence, with US approval, uses the young engineer, Osama bin Laden, to funnel millions of dollars to rebel forces. Starting in ’87, CIA begins issuing visas to Middle East applicants to come to the US for training in terrorism for the war in collaboration with bin Laden (this continues into the 90s).

1988 — 89: Soviets withdraw from Afghanistan; the USSR begins to unravel.

1992: With half their population affected (1 million dead, 3 million wounded, 5 million refugees), Afghan society is destroyed. Having no further use for the country, the US walks away. The Taliban rises from the ruins.

A “fixation with combating the Soviet threat,” writes historian Douglas Little, “had led a generation of US policymakers to neglect the appeal of revolutionary nationalism and radical Islam among the people of the Muslim world” – an appeal that our actions served to deepen.

“That the Pakistani and US intelligence services helped stroke the fires of radical Islam among bin Laden and the Afghan mujahideen during the 1980s is one of the cruelest ironies of the Cold War,” says Little; both bin Laden and the Taliban, he points out, “were to some degree Frankenstein’s monsters created by US and Pakistani political experiments that were too clever by half.”

While it is true that a good part of the resistance to the Soviets was indigenous, the fact is that we instigated an anti-Communist “proxy” war that resulted in worldwide terrorist blowback. If, concludes Little, we had had some sympathy for revolutionary nationalism in the 1950s, for figures such as Mossadegh [see my Early Histories I] and Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser – whose aspirations were hardly those of a clash of civilizations – we might have avoided Khomeini and bin Laden.

– Morris Berman, Dark Ages America (This was the main source for the Early Histories Series)

Early Histories II: Iraq

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.7.07]

1920: League of Nations makes Mesopotamia a British protectorate.

1921: British install King Faisal I on the throne, then sign a treaty with the King placing military and economic control of the country in British hands.

1927: Oil is discovered in Iraq just north of Kirkuk.

1929: The Iraqi Petroleum Company (IPC) is founded with shares to British, French, Dutch, American and Portuguese companies and none to Iraq.

1958: Abdul Karim Qasim leads a military coup overthrowing the pro-British government and executing King Faisal II and his family. Seen even today by Iraqis as the moment of liberation from the British.

1961: Qasim demands the IPC grant Iraq 20% ownership and 55% of the profits. IPC refuses so he decrees that by ’63 IPC will be stripped of 99.5% of its concession in the country and establishing the state-owned Iraq National Oil Company.

1959 — 63: Once again, as in Iran, Arab nationalists are seen as Communist by the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations. After numerous attempts at assassination by the CIA (including a plot using a poisoned handkerchief and another with the young Saddam Hussein playing a role), Qassim is removed by coup. The Ba’ath party comes to power just before the new law on IPC was to go into effect. New regime reaffirms IPC’s control over Iraq oil fields.

1964 — 68: New leadership dismisses and arrests Ba’athist leaders. Saddam is imprisoned until he escapes in ’67. In ’68, Ba’athists overthrow the government; Saddam is made deputy to the president, but quickly emerges as the more powerful.

1972: Iraq becomes the first Arab country to nationalize its oil. By ’79, oil exports flood Iraqi coffers with $47 billion (in that year alone). Unlike Iran, petrodollars in Iraq filter down to the Iraqi people, creating an extensive free public services, a large body of small landowners and a strong public sector.

1979: Saddam takes the presidency after the former president begins making treaties with Syria (also Ba’athist) to unite the 2 countries (and marginalize Saddam forever). He begins purging “disloyal” party members and is considered the worst of all Middle-East tyrants before or since. US considers him a bulwark against Communism, so doesn’t care what he does to his people.

1980 - 88: Opportunistic Saddam invades Iraq with US tacit approval. Envisioning a quick victory, he is rebuffed by the Iranians.

1982: Reagan administration secretly provides Saddam with satellite photos of Iranian troop movements; funnels black market arms to Iraq; takes Iraq off the state terrorist list (even though intelligence showed Saddam supporting terrorism), so Iraq is eligible to buy arms and technology.

1983: While receiving intelligence that Iraq is using chemical weapons on Iranians almost daily, Reagan responds by restoring diplomatic relations with Iraq and authorizing the sale of poisonous chemicals, anthrax and bubonic plague.

1986: American air force officers sent to work with Iraqis; US Navy sinks 3 Iranian patrol boats and 2 offshore oil platforms.

1988: US forces blow up 2 oil rigs and put half the Iranian navy out of action.

1988: After Iran-Iraq war ends, Saddam uses US-made helicopters to drop chemical bombs on 30 Kurdish cities killing 3 – 5, 000. Pentagon concocts story that Iran is responsible.

1989: Iraqi personnel are allowed to attend the 9th annual Symposium on Detonation at Los Alamos; all during the 80s, US military exports are knowingly sent to Iraqi nuclear installations.

1990 I: After the Voice of America broadcasts an editorial criticizing Iraqi’s abysmal human rights record, US ambassador to Iraq is forced to apologize, then all future VOA broadcasts have to be cleared by the State department.

1990 II:

July 24
: Margaret Tutwiler, State Department spokesperson: “there are no special defense or security commitments to Kuwait.”

July 25
: US Ambassador Glaspie, who is fluent in Arabic, tells Sadddam “we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border dispute with Kuwait.”

August 2
: Iraq invades Kuwait.

August 6
: Bush, Sr. declares intention to eject Iraq from Kuwait.

During August: Saddam’s regime attempts (5 times) to negotiate with US (all are rejected or ignored).

1991: After a young Kuwaiti woman testifies about babies being thrown from incubators to the ground (she is actually the daughter of a Kuwaiti leader, coached by a US PR firm from a script), US invades Iraq, buying off other Arab nations (and punishing those who don’t support the action by cutting aid), stationing troops in Saudi-Arabia (the start of infidels on Arab lands). US bombs Iraqi infrastructure (in violation of international law): 200,000 die. In February, after a cease-fire is in place, US pilots (jokingly calling it a “turkey shoot”) slaughter retreating Iraqi troops, killing upwards of 30,000 (in violation of international law).

1991 – 2003: Sanctions meant to pressure Saddam into resigning only serve to consolidate his power and succeed in killing 500,000 children (over just the first 8 years). US fights aggressively to prevent Iraq from purchasing dangerous weapons such as: items necessary to generate electricity, dialysis, dental and firefighting equipment, water tankers, milk- and yogurt-production equipment, vaccines for children, flour milling contracts, wheelbarrows, toilet paper, the list goes on and on. Images of mal-nourished and dead kids flood the Arab world.

Early Histories I: Iran

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.7.07]

1908: British company strikes oil in what is then known as Persia. British government moves in taking a 50% interest in the company.

1919: The Anglo-Persian Agreement is signed finalizing British control of Persian army, treasury, transport system and communication network. Martial law is declared. Huge amounts of oil are extracted. Persian people get nothing.

1921 25: British assist a military coup, co-lead by Reza Khan Mirpanj, who eventually forces the King into exile and has himself made 1st Shah.

1933: Change in oil agreement giving Persia some of the oil profits (£7mil out of the £40mil made in 1947). The Shah changes Persia to Iran in 1935 to signify the Aryan origins of Persia, influenced by his close ties to Nazi Germany.

1941: UK and Russia invade Iran and depose the Shah, who is too close to the Nazis. His son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, is placed in power.

1949: Independent audit of the British oil company reveals it has been cheating Iran out off huge sums of money. The Majlis (Iran Parliament) begins moving towards either a 50-50 split or outright nationalization.

1951: Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, an upper-class Iranian committed to democracy and self-determination, gets a law through Parliament nationalizing the petroleum industry. Mossadegh comes to address the UN to defend his policies. He is made Time’s Man of the Year for 1951 (“the Iranian George Washington”).

1952 – 53: Regime changes; Newly-elected President Eisenhower’s Administration includes the Dulles brothers, who are proponents of the Cold War and see Communists everywhere. Meanwhile, Churchill’s Conservative party comes back into power in the UK, hell bent on keeping their grasp on the oil of Persia. The English persuade the US to attempt a coup of Mossadegh.

Although Roger Coiran, CIA chief of station in Tehran, warned Dulles that a coup would result in Iranians forever viewing the United States as a supporter of colonialism, the CIA orchestrates a series of dirty tricks, bribes and kickbacks (called Operation Ajax) to depose Mossedegh. The Shah retakes the throne. A new oil agreement is signed splitting Iran oil profits amongst UK (40%), US (40%) and other European (20%) oil corporations.

1954: Elections for Parliament are blatantly rigged; the Majdis become a rubber stamp for the Shah. Over the next 25 years, the Shah uses his secret police, the notorious Savak (trained by the CIA and Mossad), to torture more than a half million (of which at least 10,000 were killed).

The US action is transparent to the peoples and leaders of the Mid-East and tilts the region away from freedom and democracy toward dictatorships. The message is clear: oppressive regimes are ok as long as they are friendly to the West.

The Shah is allowed to purchase any weapons short of nuclear from the US and given the aid to do so. In the 70s, one-third of all US military purchases were made by Iran. Regular Iranians saw none of the plentiful US aid the Shaw was raking in during this time. People were doing so badly (average annual wage: $350), they turned to religion. The Ayotollahs gained influence.

1978 - 79: Anti-Shah demonstrations begin; President Carter sends riot-control equipment and is blamed by angry Iranians. The Shah is forced to flee to Panama, then comes to the US for medical treatment, making the Iranians suspicious that the US will once again try a coup. Iranians take hostages from the American Embassy as “insurance” against this widely-held assumption.

1980: Carter fails to free the hostages and as negotiations drag along, Regan is elected and suddenly, the hostages are freed. Iran nationalizes oil.

McCain is Honored ...

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.6.07]

…with a Web site focusing on his misstatements, obfuscations, flip-flops. It’s chock full of great vids that clarify who this man really is. Check it out!



The Hawks of Central Park

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.6.07]

Yesterday my friend was in Central Park and saw Pale Male catch and eat one of the many rats that populate the park. The hawk was the first to nest on a City building and has his own web site, which is stocked with high-resolution photos taken almost daily by the hawk spotters. Three pairs now live on buildings around the park and there are 4 more that fly in and hunt. Not just rats though: pigeons, mice and squirrels make a good catch.

Bubble News

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.5.07]


Well, the Fed, the US Treasury and the Bush administration–the real axis of evil–would like to forestall the inevitable recession-depression until they carry out their forthcoming attack on Iran. That’s why Bush is sending another carrier group to the Gulf as well as a squadron of F-16s to Turkey. The US is clamping down on transactions with Iran’s main banks and has coerced the Saudis into “discounting their top-line sweet crude by $1.75 to US customers” (Golden Jackass.com) to put additional pressure on Iranian oil exports. This is the real story behind the falling (gas) prices, not the (East Coast) weather.
Uncle Sam is gearing up for another Middle East dust-up in Iran and the lower gas prices are (temporarily) averting a US recession.

[full article here]
A recession is certain, it’s only a matter of when. After the dot com bubble popped in 2000, real estate became a haven for investment. With prices going up every year, it was easy to think of home purchases as just an investment, a savings account even, whose total keeps rising; easy to become lulled into treating equity appreciation as eternal, to borrow on the future to finance a lifestyle dependent on continued prosperity even as wage growth was in decline.
Every year From 1915 to 1965, property doubled in price. But the dollar lost value faster so, in reality, homeowners lost one third of their purchasing power.
In real terms, the prices of 1910 went down all the way to the 1990s. Only recently did they begin to go up enough to offset inflationary losses. And only in 2005 did they regain the heights last seen early in the last century.

Liquidity and confidence were running at epic highs [in 1914] just before WWI. When they crashed, they crashed hard. Property in the United States did not recover for another 91 years. You can see the long trends in real property prices simply by opening your eyes.

Higher prices of real estate make it profitable to build tall buildings because the higher construction costs are offset by lower land costs. Most major cities in the United States had tall buildings built between 1914 and 1933 during the real estate boom of that time frame. After the tallest building was built, it typically took about 41 years for the real estate prices to return to levels that would justify buildings of similar height.

Here is a data set of example cities:


RegionName of CityTallest Building Built during previous peakYear in which the record was broken.Number of years to break the previous peak
WestSeattle1914 (Smith Tower)1969*55
WestLos Angeles1927196841
WestSan Francisco1927196538
MidwestChicago1930196535
MidwestMinneapolis1929197344
MidwestDetroit1928197749
MidwestCincinnati1931Not yet broken75+
MidwestCleveland1930199161
MidwestSt. Paul1930198656
MidwestColumbus1927197346
MidwestKansas City1931198049
EastNew York1931197039
EastPhiladelphia1932197442
EastBoston1915196449
EastPittsburgh1932197038
SouthDallas1923194320
SouthHouston1929196233
SouthTulsa1918196648
ForeignToronto1931196736
ForeignMexico City1956198428

[full text here]
By this measure, one could conclude that a housing downturn & recovery cycle could take 4 to 6 decades. And also that the average homeowner is just a bit better than his counterpart in 1910. But probably not, because the 1910 homeowner surely owned his home. Today, homes are bought on credit by those who have no down payment and are less creditworthy than ever thanks to interest-only and negative-amortization loans. Their debt doesn’t go down and it can get even higher.
Michael Hudson says in The New Road to Serfdom [here, then under Articles]:
The problem for recent homebuyers is not just that prices are falling; it’s that prices are falling even as the buyers’ total mortgage remains the same or even increases. Eventually the price of the house will fall below what homeowners owe, a state that economists call negative equity. Homeowners with negative equity are trapped. They can’t sell—the declining market price won’t cover what they owe the bank—but they still have to make those (often growing) monthly payments. Their only “choice” is to cut back spending in other areas or lose the house—and everything they paid for it—in foreclosure.
This is likely to happen soon. Declining prices don’t work well with sudden loan payment increases forced along by interest-only loans that have principle kick in after a 3-year grace period and ARMs resetting this year and the next:
[In 2007], an estimated $1 trillion of ARMs (Adjustable Rate Mortgages) are due to “reset” which will cause stiff increases in monthly mortgage payments. We’re bound to see a steady rise in defaults as well as a boost in new claims for personal bankruptcy.
This downward cycle is just beginning. In 2006, a mere $300 billion in ARMs reset pushing overleveraged homeowners to the brink of insolvency. Imagine what will happen in 2007 when $1 trillion of these explosive loans comes due.

[full text here]
Isn’t this obvious? How did we get here? Maybe, it goes to the core of how we are as a country now:
Why would the United States run such huge trade deficits, we wondered. It was obviously a bad idea, the nation was ruining itself. And why would it launch an invasion of Iraq…or begin a war on terror - both of which were almost certain to be costly blunders. It was as if the United States wanted to destroy itself - first by bankrupting its economy, and second by creating enemies all over the globe.

Then, we realized, that of course, that is exactly what it must do. People come to believe what they need to believe when they need to believe it. America is an empire; its people must think like imperialists. In order to fulfill their mission, the homeland citizens had to become what George Orwell called “hollow dummies.” An imperial people must believe that they deserve to be the imperial power - that is, they must believe they have the right to tell other people what to do. In order to do so, they must believe what isn’t true - that their own culture, society, economy, political system, or they themselves are superior to others.

It is a vain conceit, but it so bright and so big it exercises a kind of gravitational pull over the entire society. Soon, it has set in motion a whole system of shiny vanities and illusions as distant from the truth as Pluto and as bizarre as Saturn. Americans believe they can get rich by spending someone else’s money. They believe that foreign countries actually want to be invaded and taken over. They believe they can run up debt forever, and that their debt-laden houses are as good as money in the bank. [full text here]

Camille on Religion

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.2.07]

I’ve been a fan of Camille Paglia since the early 90s. She has this unrestrained quality to her statements and writings that is provocative and always interesting. I often disagree with some of her statements but, just as often, wildly agree with others. What I find most interesting is how she makes use of so many vastly different cultural events and icons to come to her unique conclusions and opinions.

An example follows. It’s from salon (to which she was a founding contributor) done just before the November elections:

Salon: It seems like religion has never been a bigger issue in American politics… Have the Democrats changed the longtime Republican characterization of them as godless?

Camille: Well, as long as the Democrats are perceived as the anti-religion party, we’re going to lose the culture wars. That’s why Hillary has made such a show of churchgoing and wearing crucifixes — even while there seems to be little connection between her Christian ideals and her…activities as a politician… But religion is absolutely central to this country… I’m speaking here as an atheist who studies religion and respects it enormously. In the history of mankind, the benefits that religion has brought to society in shaping behavior and moral choice are overwhelming in comparison to the negatives, which anyone can list — like religious wars and bigotry. Without religion, we’d have anarchy.

Religion is also a metaphysical system that honors the largeness of the universe. So I think that the constant sniping at religion coming from liberal Democrats is really a dead end.

But there’s reason for alarm at the right-wing intertwining of religion and politics, where the Bible is seen as the prophetic master plan of the universe and where Israel as the Holy Land must be protected at all costs from Muslim infiltration — duplicating the agenda of the medieval crusades. But to claim, as Democrats often do, that there has always been a separation of church and state in America is misleading: The U.S. simply has no official state religion. The formative influence in our intellectual heritage came from Puritan dissidents in New England. Major universities like Harvard and Yale were founded on religious principles.

What do contemporary intellectuals have to offer anyhow? What passionate engagement do they have to appeal to young people? Liberal secularism has become bourgeois and materialistic. It’s snide, elitist, and politically marginalized. The chattering class clearly has no effect whatever on decision-making in Washington. Conservative radio hosts have been claiming that liberal criticism of Bush’s decisiveness in invading Iraq mirrors the shilly-shallying of 1930s intellectuals during Hitler’s rise.

Secret Government

[Originally posted on goofyblog 2.1.07]

One of the good things about the aftermath of the Vietnam War fiasco, the Watergate break-in and Nixon’s resignation, was an opening up of government. The secretiveness of the Nixon Administration was too much. Laws were passed to open up all the processes of government and laws were passed to restrict the spaying activities of government agencies.

But government behind closed doors is the main philosophy of the Bush Administration. Here’s a short list (from tpm muckracker):

Economy/Employment

In March, the administration announced it would no longer produce the Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation, which identifies which programs best assist low-income families, while also tracking health insurance coverage and child support.

After the Bureau of Labor Statistics uncovered discouraging data about factory closings in the U.S., the administration announced it would stop publishing information about factory closings.

When an annual report called “Budget Information for States” showed the federal government shortchanging states in the midst of fiscal crises, Bush’s Office of Management and Budget announced it was discontinuing the report, which some said was the only source for comprehensive data on state funding from the federal government.

In December 2002, the administration curtailed funding to the Mass-Layoffs Statistics program, which released monthly data on the number and size of layoffs by U.S. companies. His father attempted to kill the same program in 1992, but Clinton revived it when he assumed the presidency.

After Bush assumed power in 2001, the Department of Labor removed from its Web site “Don’t Work in the Dark — Know Your Rights,” a publication informing women of their workplace rights. (via the National Council for Research on Women)

The Department of Labor also removed from its Web site roughly two dozen fact sheets on women’s workplace issues such as women in management, earning differences between men and women, child care concerns, and minority women in the workplace. (via the National Council for Research on Women)

In February 2004, the appointed head of the Office of Special Counsel — created to protect government employees’ rights — ordered removed from a government Web site information on the rights of gay men, lesbians and bisexuals in the public workplace. (via the National Council for Research on Women)

Terrorism

In 2005, after a government report showed an increase in terrorism around the world, the administration announced it would stop publishing its annual report on international terrorism.

No Child Left Behind

When Bush’s Department of Education found that charter schools were underperforming, the administration said it would sharply cut back on the information it collects about charter schools

Climate Change/Environment

The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has to date failed to produce a congressionally-mandated report on climate change that was due in 2004. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has called the failure an “obfuscation.”

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced plans to close several libraries which were used by researchers and scientists. The agency called its decision a cost-cutting measure, but a 2004 report showed that the facilities actually brought the EPA a $7.5 million surplus annually. (Thanks to Mark B. below.)

A rule change at the U.S. Geological Survey restricts agency scientists from publishing or discussing research without that information first being screened by higher-ups at the agency. Special screening will be given to “findings or data that may be especially newsworthy, have an impact on government policy, or contradict previous public understanding to ensure that proper officials are notified and that communication strategies are developed.” The scientists at the USGS cover such controversial topics as global warming. Before, studies were released after an anonymous peer review of the research. (Thanks to Alison below.)

A new policy at the The U.S. Forest Service means the agency no longer will generate environmental impact statements for “its long-term plans for America’s national forests and grasslands.” It also “no longer will allow the public to appeal on long-term plans for those forests, but instead will invite participation in planning from the outset.” (Thanks to libra below.)

Also in 2002, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission removed from its Web site a document showing that officials found large gaps in a portion of an aging Montana dam. A FERC official said the deletion was for “national security.”

In 2002, Bush officials intervened to derail the publication of an EPA report on mercury and children’s health, which contradicted the administration’s position on lowering regulations on certain power plants. The report was eventually leaked by a “frustrated EPA official.”

In 2003, the EPA bowed to White House pressure and deleted the global warming section in its annual “Report on the Environment.” The move drew condemnations from Democrats and Republicans alike.

Also in 2003, the EPA withheld for months key findings from an air pollution report that undercut the White House’s “Clear Skies” initiative. Leaked copies were reported in the Washington Post.

Records

On November 1st, 2001, President Bush issued an executive order limiting the public’s access to presidential records. The order undermined the 1978 Presidential Records Act, which required the release of those records after 12 years. Bush’s order prevented the release of “68,000 pages of confidential communications between President Ronald Reagan and his advisers,” some of whom had positions in the Bush Administration. More here. (Thanks to Roger A. and nitpicker below.) Update: TPMm Reader JP writes in to point out that Bush did the same thing with his papers from the Texas governorship.

In 2004, the Internal Revenue Service stopped providing data demonstrating the level of its job performance. In 2006, a judge forced the IRS to provide the information.

In 2004, the FBI attempted to retroactively classify public information regarding the case of bureau whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, including a series of letters between the Justice Department and several senators.

Also in 2004, the Federal Communications Commission blocked access to a once-public database of network outages affecting telecommunications service providers. The FCC removed public copies and exempted the information from Freedom of Information Act requests, saying it would “jeopardize national security efforts.” Experts ridiculed that notion.

In early 2001, the Treasury Department stopped producing reports showing how the benefits of tax cuts were distributed by income class. (via the Tax Policy Center, from Paul Krugman)

Sex Education/Information

In March 2006, the Department of Health and Human Services took down a six-year-old Web site devoted to substance abuse and treatment information for gays and lesbians, after members of the conservative Family Research Council complained.

In 2002, HHS removed information from its Web site pertaining to risky sexual behavior among adolescents, condom use and HIV.

War

In October 2003, the Bush administration banned photographs depicting servicemembers’ coffins returning from overseas.

Corruption

For more than a year, the Interior Department refused to release a 2005 study showing a government subsidy for oil companies was not effective.

In 2006, the Federal Communications Commission ordered destroyed all copies of an unreleased 2004 draft report concluding that media consolidation hurt local TV news coverage, which runs counter to the administration’s pro-consolidation stance. (Thanks to Jim Tobias below.)

In 2006, as a number of groups sought records of visits by disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his associates to the White House, the administration quietly made an agreement with the Secret Service, making sure that White House visitor records would no longer be subject to Freedom of Information Act requests.

Drug War

The White House Office of National Drug Policy paid for a 5-year, $43 million study which concluded their anti-drug ad campaigns did not work — but it refused to release those findings to Congress. (Thanks to skeptic below.)

How times have changed. This is just a partial list and doesn’t even begin to get into the insane “classification” of almost everything by a government run amuck, concerned more with covering up its mistakes and errors than the need for the people it represents to know.

Example: for 25 years, Jon Weiner fought the FBI to have some of their files on John Lennon de-classified. The FBI said for 25 years that the information was too sensitive to be de-classified. Last month, they finally released the 10 super-duper classified pages. What’s in them? Some bullshit about Lennon’s association with London members of the New Left, a fact commonly known and reported publicly at the time of his association. See for yourself here.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Oil’s Other Use

[Originally posted on goofyblog 1.31.07]



Overshoot: when a species reproduces to a number that its environment can not sustain.

In 1944, for example, 29 reindeer were introduced onto St. Matthew Island in the Bering Sea. With few competitors, no predators and plenty to eat, the herd increased to about 6,000 by the summer of 1963, consuming almost all available food. That winter most of them died. The surviving population in 1966 numbered 42.

At the end of the 19th century the human population was 1.6 billion. It is now 6.5 billion.

The food that made this amazing increase possible came primarily by boosting crop yields with petroleum. With fertilizer from natural gas, with crops bred to capitalize on that fertilizer and with petroleum-powered machinery and irrigation wells, we can produce huge yields — more than 7,000 pounds of corn per acre, for example. Just one lifetime ago, corn yields were one-fifth of that. Wheat yields have almost tripled. Similar comparisons can be made for other grains.

But, this can’t last. The aquifers, oil and natural gas that made possible a fourfold population increase are finite. Over the coming decades petroleum will become harder and harder to find, extract and put to use, until eventually it becomes unavailable for agriculture in any significant amount. Meanwhile, another 2 billion people are predicted worldwide by 2050.

David Bacon, Prairie Writers Circle, The Population Bubble

This year, 2007, is the year that over half the world’s population will be living in cities:

While the world’s urban population was just one billion in 1804, by 1985 it had risen to two billion and by 2002 it was three billion. If the trend continues, the world’s urban population will double every 38 years, say researchers.

A significant development has been the rise of the “megacity”, conurbations - such as Tokyo, Mexico City, Bombay, Sao Paulo and New York - that have populations in excess of 10 million inhabitants.

One billion people, one-sixth of the world’s population, now live in shanty towns.

Factory farming isn’t labor-intensive. People who can’t make it in the country have to come to the city where they heard there’re jobs a plenty. What they find instead may curl your hair, but it’s probably better than starving.
They will need food from the countryside, but can our system of factory farming (the same system that drives rurals to the city) powered by oil continue? Well, no:

[Factory farming] relies on an energy-intensive process of producing nitrogen-rich fertilizer from oil and cattle feed from natural gas. It requires about 10 calories of oil energy to produce every calorie of corn grown in the United States. Meanwhile the process, combining nitrogen with toxic chemical weedkillers, is literally destroying the soil that our food grows in. The chemically-enhanced crops we grow in monoculture, like corn, are sucking all the nutrients out of the topsoil, turning it into dust. For more information on “catastrophic agriculture,” the energy-intensive farming that requires the equivalent of “4,000 Nagasakis” in Iowa alone every year, check out “The Oil We Eat,” by Richard Manning.

[Non-factory farming] is possible. Over in Castro’s Cuba, the collapse of the Soviet Union doomed an economy based on energy-intensive industrial agriculture and cash crops. The Cuban government responded by mandating an agricultural revolution. Organics replaced industrial, and now Cuba is almost entirely self-sufficient when it comes to food—the country is actually de-industrializing and becoming more agrarian. In 1999 the Swedish parliament awarded the Cuban Organic Farming Group its Right Livelihood Award, often styled the “alternative Nobel.”

-Ethan Heitner, The Dirt on Our Farms

At the end of 2004, the New York Times Magazine reported on the new term,”feral cities,” to describe large world cities where the government has lost the ability to enforce the rule of law. So the demand for food to feed the billions in urban cities will just increase from here on.

But, our species can’t sustain growth if we are depending on big agra and its oil economies. In addition to the global warming/dimming problem (which will affect crop yields and arable land), the topsoil is fading as well. It would take enlightened leadership focused on the long-term, something at which corporations beholden to shareholders and politicians beholden to corporate lobbyists aren’t very good.

On our own, we need to develop and implement an alternate way of producing food PDQ and/or a way to reduce our population growth or we’ll overshoot like those reindeer on St. Matthew Island.

Public Domain

[Originally posted on goofyblog 1.31.07]



This June, Netflix will make 1,000 movies available for download rental and this is certainly the future of the vid rental industry (sorry, Blockbuster). I’ve just discovered an interesting archive site of films in the public domain, which is worth a look.

Prelinger Archives was founded in 1983 by Rick Prelinger in New York City. Over the next twenty years, it grew into a collection of over 48,000 “ephemeral” (advertising, educational, industrial, and amateur) films. In 2002, the film collection was acquired by the Library of Congress, Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division. Prelinger Archives remains in existence, holding approximately 4,000 titles on videotape and a smaller collection of film materials acquired subsequent to the Library of Congress transaction.

By going here, you can see the archive and either stream or download full-length films and shorts (at many different qualities and file types; download using either ftp or http). The selection ranges from Reefer Madness to Charlie Chaplin shorts from Classic Television Commercials to footage of the bridges being built in San Francisco Bay, even the ruins of the 1906 Earthquake.

Prelinger has been fighting (all the way to the Supreme Court) the over-extension of copyright protections that Congress authorized under pressure from big media corporations, which effectively take every work created after 1977 out of the public domain for over a century. While Congress’ actions have allowed Disney to keep control of their Mickey Mouse franchise, there are now thousands of “orphan” works that can not be published or viewed in any form (free or for pay) because no one can be found to grant permission.

The Supreme Court affirmed the right of Congress to drastically extend copyright even though the Constitution specifically states:”to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts . . . by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive rights to their respective writings and discoveries[emphasis added].”

That used to mean the creator of the work, a person, could profit from their creativity for several years (originally 14) after their work was published. Apparently, now it means the corporation, a legal person, can profit from the creativity of an individual over several lifetimes. There is a move afoot to get the law repealed along with further court challenges to free up these works for all.

Escalate?

[Originally posted on goofyblog 1.30.07]



I went through the Pentagon a week after 9/11. One of the Generals…calls me after I’d seen Rumsfeld. He said, “Sir, come in here.” He said, “Sir, we’re going to invade Iraq.” I said, “We’re going to invade Iraq!?! Why?” And he said, “Because,” he says, “I don’t know why. Really,” he said, “It doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, but,” he said, “I guess they don’t know what to do about the problem of terrorism, and if the only tool you have is a hammer, then every problem has to look like a nail.”

He said, “We don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we can take down governments. So, I guess they’re looking for a government to take down. Meanwhile we started bombing in Afghanistan.

So well, I came back to see the same General in early November [2001]. I said, “Are we still going to invade Iraq?” He said, “Yes, Sir,” he said, “but it’s worse than that.” I said, “How do you mean?” He held up this piece of paper. He said, “I just got this memo today or yesterday from the office of the Secretary of Defense upstairs. It’s a, it’s a five-year plan. We’re going to take down seven countries in five years. We’re going to start with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, then Libya, Somalia, Sudan, we’re going to come back and get Iran in five years.[emphasis added] I said, “Is that classified, that paper?” He said, “Yes Sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me, because I want to be able to talk about it.”

That was retired-General Wesley Clark giving a speech at the University of Alabama in October 2006. The full transcript can be found here, which includes a Q&A and it makes for enlightening reading.

In other words, we’ve got an out of control militarized leadership who’ve been looking for countries to invade ever since the collapse of the USSR and the end of the fake Cold War. As Sheldon Drobny writes in “The Dark Side of the Domino Theory:”

The idea of a monolithic enemy came from NSC-68 issued in 1950. Paul Nitze was the author of this NSC statement that was the by-product of a George Kennan’s “Long Telegram” from Moscow in 1946, and the subsequent 1947 article “The Sources of Soviet Conduct” that argued that the Soviet regime was inherently expansionist and that its influence had to be “contained” in areas of vital strategic importance to the United States.

Shortly after NSC-68 became official U.S. policy, Kennan began to criticize the policies that he had seemingly helped launch. By mid-1948, he was convinced that the situation in Western Europe had improved to the point where negotiations could be initiated with Moscow. The suggestion did not resonate within the Truman administration, and Kennan’s influence was increasingly marginalized–particularly after Dean Acheson was appointed Secretary of State in 1949. As U.S. Cold War strategy assumed a more aggressive and militaristic tone, Kennan bemoaned what he called a misinterpretation of his thinking.

The CIA intelligence at the time confirmed that the Soviet Union even under Stalin was not in favor of expanding communism with the exception of its Eastern European satellite states to protect itself from another German invasion. The Truman Administration either ignored or skewed the intelligence that confirmed the Soviet position regarding world-wide expansion was a myth to help scare the American people enough to accept a buildup of the military industrial complex.

In our American History classes we were taught that there had been worries after WWII the U.S. would de-militarize as it had done after WWI and this was thought to be a weakness due to the threat of Communism, which we were scared into thinking was just on the other side of our front doors.

This rationale was proffered for the Korean and the Vietnam wars that followed in the decades immediately after. But, even in the 40s, our own intelligence determined that there was not much need for such a build up.

And there was definitely no excuse for a large military after the Soviets caved so, whoops, along come the Muslims!

For our current leaders, the thinking here is strictly military. Spend, build weapons, find someone to use the weapons on, find reasons to use the weapons on them, use the weapons on them, spend more, build more weapons, etc.

No thought of diplomacy and negotiation. And there have been plenty of times where that could’ve been done instead of a military option (just look at recent reports of Iran offering to talk with Cheney in 2003).

As Drobny says:

The regime change we need to build a peaceful Middle East is the rejection of the current leadership and military dominance that has plagued our nation for nearly 60 years. We in the U.S. have to get our own house in order to reject the insane military confrontation that has been evangelized by the Pentagon and their corporate sponsors. That will be the true test for leadership for the current Congress and the Presidential campaign of 2008.

Regime change begins at home. Are we Sparta or Athens? Let the next 12 months be a time of radical change in direction.

“Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other.”

~James Madison

Bad Bugs, No Drugs

[Originally posted on goofyblog 1.29.07]

Dangerous bacteria, resistant to all antibiotics, have benefited from our war adventure in Iraq. The Grand daddy of them all is something called Acinetobacter baumannii. It got its start (possibly) from some contaminated medical supplies shipped from Germany to a medical facility in Iraq, Ibn Sina Hospital, at the start of the war. Since then, it has mutated.

“Bacteria that know how to disable or block the efficacy of multiple drugs are highly educated organisms. They’re typically the product of an environment where antibiotics are in frequent use, and they have downloaded genetic cheat codes from other resistant bacteria into their own DNA.

“[Acinetobacter] carries the largest collection of generic upgrades ever discovered in a single organism. Out of its 52 genes dedicated to defeating antibiotics, radiation, and other weapons of mass bacterial destruction, nearly all have been bootlegged from other bad bugs like Salmonella, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia coli.”

-Wired (full article here)

The bacteria can survive for weeks on stethoscopes, a blood-pressure cuff, mattresses, so it colonizes patients in hospitals and medical facilities. Then it’s imported into Europe and the U.S. on the bodies of wounded soldiers, where it spreads to civilian patients.

Different strains of the bacteria have been common for years, it only attacks the weak and older, but the use of multiple antibiotics as part of the highly-successful, survival-rate strategies employed by the US Military has caused a quicker mutation. And although hospitals in Iraq, Europe and the US have adapted new measures for minimizing the infection rate, once it takes hold it can kill, and nothing, save a strong immune system, makes a difference.

Hackers & Corps

[Originally posted on goofyblog 1.26.07]

In 2003, a grandmother from Seattle started investigating the corporations that make computerized voting machines. One night, she stumbled on an ftp site for Diebold Corp. and was successful in downloading their code for the machines and, more important, the code for the central counting system.

She was able to get software engineers to review this code and was a key player in California’s decision to de-certify all of Diebold’s machines (though the Secretary of State threatened Diebold with civil & criminal charges, the Attorney General did not pusue the criminal angle, Diebold settled the civil case out of court for less than $3 million and the State continues to use Diebold’s faulty, buggy central counting software anyway).

Later, this same woman went dumpster diving all over the U.S. to find more evidence of fraud and faulty testing of these machines and she struck pay dirt. The vid above is part 1 of the HBO documentary “Hacking Democracy,” which is about her and other’s efforts to prevent voter fraud in America, whether intentional or just from incompetent, insecure computer software. It’s worth a watch. You can find the remaining parts on youtube with a casual search.

The most amazing scene for me, is when she demonstrates to Howard Dean how easy it is to hack into Diebold’s central counting software and change the votes. The on-screen demo shows that Diebold uses an Access database for their counting software!! Not SQL Server or Oracle, but Access. Jeezus.

The documentary further illustrates the dangers of allowing private corporations to take over public government functions in that the secrecy demanded by these private corps precludes an open democratic process that keeps our votes fair and out country free. Check it out including her web site!

A Visual Guide to Healthcare

[Originally posted on goofyblog 1.25.07]

This strip from Tom Tomorrow appeared a week ago. In California, Arnold has put forth a plan similar to the one now being tried in Mass. But since both measures are essentially appeasements for the insurance companies and tied to the citizen’s employer they will fail. A universal care measure passed by the Senate (SB 840 – Keuhl (D-Santa Monica)) was vetoed by Arnie.

Kiefer Sutherland’s grandfather, Tommy Douglas, was voted the greatest Canadian of all time in 2004. Why? Because he did what few politicians ever do. He started Canada on the way to a successful single-payer system of health care. He’s admired in his country and Canada’s health care system is admired world wide.

UPDATE: Since Bush brought up health care in his STOU address, this rebuttal of his suggestions is appropriate here:

The president…realized…that the American people want a national health care system for themselves and their children as much as they want our troops out of the killing fields of Iraq. So he offered several unworkable and ridiculous suggestions: relief from payroll taxes and a tax credit to the uninsured. What is he thinking? That the uninsured have big salaries and are seeking some kind of tax shelter?

His proposed $15,000 income tax deduction for middle-class families would jeopardize both Medicare and Social Security while not providing enough money to purchase real health insurance, projected to cost $16,500 for a family of four by the year 2009. And employers would be encouraged to bail out of the health care system even faster than they are today.

His plan for fixing the health care system is more of the same—more big bucks for the insurance companies. He believes that government has a responsibility for the children, the elderly and the disabled—but for everybody else, “private insurance is the best.” Then he offers several plans to provide more billions of federal dollars to the private insurers who have driven the cost of the health care system up 73 percent since 2000.

I guess he means the private insurance companies that use up 31 percent of every health care dollar for their own CEOs’ salaries, payments to lobbyists, media campaigns and the multiple bureaucratic costs of thousands of insurance companies rather than a single payer such as Medicare. Those same private insurance companies provide no health care to anyone in this country. (Well, maybe they provide health care for their own employees, who number in the tens of thousands.)

He must mean those same private insurance companies whose highest-paid CEO (at United Health) gets $122.7 million dollars a year—enough to cover the health care costs of roughly 34,000 American citizens.

The president also gave a big plug for the idea of so-called federal/state partnerships. He said he will be urging the provision of federal funds to the states so that the poor and the sick can be covered to purchase insurance—with an “affordable choice.” More money for these same insurance companies! In every one of these instances, the president is talking about reckless additional spending for health care “insurance”—not a net savings such as that which we would get from a single-payer system. That’s why his highly applauded promise to balance the budget rings false—and cold-hearted.

From TomPaine

Impeach. . . Gonzales!

[Originally posted on goofyblog 1.24.07]


John Dean, former counsel to Nixon, writes about attempts at impeachment of either Bush or Cheney:

There Is No Chance Either Bush or Cheney Will Be Removed From Office

The Republican Congress shamed itself when it impeached and tried President William Jefferson Clinton. It was a repeat of what an earlier Republican Congress had done to President Andrew Johnson, following the Civil War. Both proceedings were politics at their ugliest.

Democrats, when they undertook to impeach Richard Nixon, moved very slowly, building bipartisan support for the undertaking. Nixon, of course, resigned, when it became apparent that the House had the votes to impeach and the Senate had the votes to convict, with his removal supported by Democrats and Republicans, and conservatives and liberals alike.

Getting the necessary two-thirds supermajority in support of impeachment in today’s Senate, which is virtually evenly-divided politically, is simply not possible. With forty-nine senators of the 110th Congress members in good standing with the Republican Party, and most of them rock-ribbed conservatives, even if the House produced evidence of Cheney personally water-boarding “Gitmo” detainees in the basement of his home at the Naval Observatory, with Bush looking on approvingly, there are more than thirty-three GOP Senators who still would not vote to convict. (Senate Republicans who have no problem with torture, or with removing the right to habeas corpus, and who refused to exercise any oversight whatsoever of Bush or Cheney, are hardly going to remove these men for actions in which they too are complicit.)

Pelosi and Reid have long understood this reality, and rather than do to Bush and/or Cheney what Republicans did to Clinton - impeach him in the House merely because they had the power to do so and they wanted to tarnish him, only to lose their battle decisively in the Senate - they are simply not going to play the same game. Politically, this is smart. Americans do not want another impeachment, particularly when Bush and Cheney will be out of office in January 2009.

What to do then? Dean’s unique idea is to instead impeach the people under Bush/Cheney. This is allowed by the Constitution and there even is a precedent for it (the impeachment of Secretary of War William Belknap, in the aftermath of the Civil War). There are many advantages in this:

Never will “serve” again. “It will be recalled that Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution states: “Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.” (Emphasis added.) After any civil officer has been impeached, under the rules of the Senate, it requires only a simple majority vote to add the disqualification from holding future office.”

Not a distraction to more important legislative business. “In addition, it is likely that the impeachment process of any official in a position below that of the president or vice president, would be treated the same as the impeachment of federal judges. The work is done in both the House and Senate by special subcommittees, so it does not consume the attention of the full bodies until the final votes.”

Stands a good chance of succeeding.

Dean wrote the above in mid-December, so it’s always possible that Bush will go so far out, an impeachment may be the only way to stop him, but check out the full article here.